When I discovered that I was being victimized by judicial corruption, I decided to fight.
I am not an attorney, and I am not giving legal advice.
This is what I have learned about how judges commit crimes.
Know How Judges Commit Crimes
To effectively battle judicial corruption, you must have a good handle on the various techniques that judges use to break the rules, favor the other party, and commit crimes. Keep these techniques in mind as you analyze what has been done to you.
I suggest that you prepare a document listing each of these techniques that are applicable to your situation, and then gather the evidence that you have of each. You will be able to use this information in many of the things that you do to battle corruption and expose the evildoers.
Judges regularly commit the crimes of obstruction of justice and perjury. They obstruct justice by using various techniques to render decisions and issue orders that are intended to deny justice.
They do this to favor certain parties and law firms. They may do it for money or other considerations, or they may do it simply because they favor certain attorneys....
For our purposes now, why they do it is not as important as the fact that they do obstruct justice. They all belong in prison.
To pursue criminal charges against judges, you need to document everything that is improper. It is my opinion that a pattern and practice of this wrongdoing can establish the crime of obstruction of justice.
These are some of the techniques the judges use:
Ignore the Law
One of the primary techniques used by corrupt judges is to simply ignore the law. One party cites the law and overwhelming case law. The favored party doesn't have the law on their side. The judge simply ignores the law and rules against the party that was legally right. In one instance, I presented literally thousands of cases that proved that I was right. In fact, there had never been a case in any court where there was a ruling other than one that would be in my favor. As I write this, I am preparing to stand trial on bogus criminal charges in Missoula Montana. Judge James A. Haynes has had one and only one motive, so he ignores the law repeatedly and rules against me. I have carefully researched the legal issues in my case, so I know what the law is.
Cite Invalid Law
Sometimes a judge will feel like citation of case law is needed to support their ruling. So, they claim a case applies when it doesn't. Judge James A. Haynes has done this. He cited the case of State v. Moga in his order dated December 4, 2015, claiming it applied to my Motion to Dismiss Count #1 due to expiration of the Statute of Limitations, but it does not apply. But he ruled against me because he needed to in order to keep some bogus charges against me to reduce the exposure of Missoula County on a malicious prosecution case. Always review the cases cited by judges so you can identify the invalid cases that are cited.
Ignore the Facts
Judges don't address points raised by parties who aren't favored. I find appellate judges are even more dishonest than lower court judges when it comes to ignoring the issues, facts, statutes, and case law. Lying about the facts in orders and lying under oath both constitute perjury. Judges are always under oath, and a judge is supposed to never say or write anything that isn't true. So, when a judge knowingly lies in orders for the purpose of ruling against a party for the judge's criminal reasons, it is a criminal violation of perjury. Each such instance is a separate count. In my case, Judge James A. Haynes has committed a number of counts of perjury. He has claimed that I have said and done things that haven't happened. He has done this so it will appear he has some justification for denying my motions without consideration and blocking my ability to file anything.
Another favorite technique is to simply ignore issues in orders. Judge James A. Haynes has ignored motions where his ruling could not possibly be explained. So, rather than make up an explanation, he just ignores those tough issues. As a result, he has not properly addressed whether Montana has jurisdiction for something that allegedly happened in Texas, whether the charges must be dismissed due to failure to provide a speedy trial, and others.
A really dishonest judge like Judge James A. Haynes will simply conceal evidence. In my case, he has denied me any discovery, and in so doing, he has concealed the evidence.
Say Nothing in Orders
One of the favorite techniques of Judge James A. Haynes is to say nothing. He simply says "denied." Montana law requires that judges provide a "findings of fact and conclusions of law" on their orders, but Judge James A. Haynes doesn't.
Block Filing of Motions and Evidence
By allowing the favored party to file anything they choose and blocking the filings and motions of the pro se party, judges commit the worst form of obstruction of justice. The pro se party is denied the information needed to defeat the other party, and there is no record of this evidence and these arguments on appeal. Judge James A. Haynes has done this to me repeatedly and in a CRIMINAL case.
Tamper with Evidence
Tampering with evidence is a crime. Judges commit tampering with evidence by causing evidence submitted for filing to disappear and not get added to the court record. In my case, Judge James A. Haynes is simply not going to allow me to use any of my evidence or ask questions of witnesses.
Deny Constitutional Rights
The Constitution is meaningless to corrupt judges. They simply violate Constitutional rights with no regard for the people they damage. All of the judges who I have encountered have violated my Constitutional rights. I have been raped of my rights to due process. I have been denied the right to call witnesses, to testify under oath, to cross-examine witnesses, to introduce evidence, to file answers to motions filed by the favored party, to file lawsuits, to contact witnesses, and much more. It is very important for you to know the Constitutional rights that judges routinely deny. The First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments are most violated by judges.
Violate and Ignore the Rules of Civil Procedure
By violating and ignoring the Rules of Civil Procedure and the Rules of Evidence, judges commit obstruction of justice. They allow the favored party to break rules and get away with it.
Automatically Rule against Certain Classes of People
Judges automatically rule against certain classes of people. The concept of fair and impartial judges is a fairy tale. I have proven that people who represent themselves as plaintiffs in the federal courts in Atlanta always lose. We have a right to represent ourselves in court, but we automatically lose. Judges are simply attorneys in black dresses, and they seem to uniformly hate parties who aren't spending a fortune with attorneys, so they screw them.
Order Monetary Sanctions against Parties they want to Damage
The criminal judges inflict damage on parties who aren't favored by ordering monetary sanctions against them. They inflict financial punishment to break people.
Refuse to Disqualify Themselves
The Constitution and case law clearly provide that we are supposed to be entitled to a fair and impartial judge, but the corrupt judges simply ignore the law. They refuse to disqualify themselves so they can inflict damage on parties who aren't favored. This has happened with Judge James A. Haynes.
Violate their Oath of Office and the Code of Judicial Conduct
Like the rules of civil procedure, a judge's Oath of Office and Code of Judicial Conduct READ great. But the judges pay no attention to the Oath or Code. When they intentionally violate their Oath and the Code of Judicial Conduct, they are intentionally damaging a party. Judge James A. Haynes may have set a record in the volume of judicial misconduct.
Conspire with Fellow Judges and Judicial Employees
The corrupt judges commit conspiracy with their fellow judges and judicial employees. They often need help from other judges as well as law clerks, the employees in the Office of the Clerk of the Court, and others. The court clerks have been very much involved in the corruption against me.
Dishonest judges allow a favored party to lie and cheat. The felony of perjury is ignored. This is an excellent way for a crooked judge to allow a favored party who is dishonest to obstruct justice. When the judge knows the testimony is perjured, the judge is suborning perjury when he or she does nothing about it and accepts the perjury as if it was fact. Judge James A. Haynes is allowing the perjured testimony of Sean B**shie to be considered fact despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
In the federal courts in Fulton County, it is extremely difficult to get a hearing. In six years, I was never granted a hearing. Hearings are dangerous for dishonest judges as courtroom observers, media, and the transcript of the hearing will force the judges to be a little more honest. Judge James A. Haynes has held hearings; he just does all the talking. It's a lecture rather than a hearing. Judge James A. Haynes has a "hearing" problem.
Practice Simulated Litigation
Dishonest judges don't issue valid orders, and they don't maintain legal dockets. I guess this makes it easier for them to manipulate things. Judge James A. Haynes has issued many handwritten documents that purport to be orders, but they are not on the Docket, and they are not valid orders.
Dismiss Cases or Grant Summary Judgments
Dishonest judges ignore the law and violate the law by dismissing cases or by granting summary judgment. This is done regularly. This keeps the honest party from the right to have a jury make the decision.
Deny Jury Trials
Judges corrupt the judicial process by depriving parties of a jury trial. Juries can't be controlled by the judges to ensure that their favored party wins, so judges end cases before the people who should win can reach a jury.
Don't Publish the Improper Orders
When they are violating the law, they have protection by not publishing the order. This keeps it from the eyes of attorneys and other judges who would identify the wrongdoing. Publishing would also make their erroneous decisions precedents for other cases. The whole legal system would be turned even more upside down if this were to happen.
Judges are Corrupt
Corruption is the abuse of power by a public official. Judicial corruption is abuse of power by a judge. Corruption does not have to be economic in character. A police officer who fabricates evidence against a person he believes to be guilty of paedophilia is not committing an economic crime; and he might do so because he believes the accused to be guilty, and does not want him to go unpunished. Economics is not necessarily involved as an element of the officer's crime or as a motivation. When police do wrong they are often motivated by a misplaced sense of justice, rather than by financial reward. Again, a person in authority motivated by sadistic pleasure who abuses her power by meting out cruel and unjust treatment to those subject to her authority, is not engaging in an economic crime; and she is not motivated by economic considerations. Judges and many of those who occupy positions of authority are motivated by a desire to exercise power for its own sake, rather than by a desire for financial reward. That said, bribery is generally regarded as the most serious form of public corruption.
How to Fight Judicial Corruption and Government Corruption -- A Step-by-Step Procedure
Part 1 in this series is "Go in with Your Eyes Open."
Part 2 in this series is "Fire Your Attorney."
Part 3 in this series is "Establish a Support Network."
Part 4 in this series is "Know How Judges Commit Crimes."
Part 5 in this series is "Document Everything -- Take Notes -- Put it in Writing."
Part 6 in this series is "Always abide by the Rules."
Part 7 in this series is "Prepare Everything Very Carefully."
Part 8 in this series is "Get Your Facts and Evidence Together."
I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney. This website expresses my OPINIONS. The comments of visitors or guest authors to the website are their opinions and do not therefore reflect my opinions. Anyone mentioned by name in any article is welcome to file a response. This website does not provide legal advice. I do not give legal advice. I do not practice law. This website is to expose government corruption, law enforcement corruption, political corruption, and judicial corruption. Whatever this website says about the law is presented in the context of how I or others perceive the applicability of the law to a set of circumstances if I (or some other author) was in the circumstances under the conditions discussed. Despite my concerns about lawyers in general, I suggest that anyone with legal questions consult an attorney for an answer, particularly after reading anything on this website. The law is a gray area at best. Please read our Legal Notice and Terms.