Judges have a Code of Judicial Conduct. Unfortunately, my experience is that judges do not comply with the Code of Judicial Conduct.
It is important to understand what judges are SUPPOSED to do so you will know when judges are violating the Code of Judicial Conduct.
The good news is that there is a Code of Judicial Conduct that provide important protections for parties. The bad news is that judges are not accountable, and the policing of judges is done by their fellow judges. My experience is that judges cover for each other so the Code of Judicial Conduct is not enforced....
This articles discusses How Judges Violate the Code of Judicial Conduct and Commit Crimes against Parties. It is important to you because you need to constantly be aware of when judges are violating their rules, the rules of civil procedure, or various criminal statutes. I am not an attorney, and this is not legal advice; this reports my experience and observations.
I always file judicial misconduct complaints because I personally want to take every opportunity that I can to battle corruption. When the complaints are ignored, I have more proof of wrongdoing by judges. I also utilize the violations that I identify in motions for recusal.
I am using the federal Code of Judicial Conduct for this article. Your state's Code of Judicial Conduct may vary. Be sure to compare this to your state's Code of Judicial Conduct. These rules need to be made state law, and the policing should be done by special grand juries. I am listing only the rules that I find judges are most likely to break.
strive to maintain the dignity appropriate to the judicial office.â€¦
judges should be held to a higher standardâ€¦.
Judges Shall Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary.
Judges do not uphold the integrity of the judiciary when they violate the Code of Judicial Conduct, the Rules of Civil Procedure, and criminal statutes. These are all violations of Canon 1.
- Judges Shall Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety
Whn judges violate the Code of Judicial Conduct, the Rules of Civil Procedure, and criminal statutes, this demonstrates impropriety and the appearance of impropriety. These are all violations of Canon 2. When judges make rulings that make no sense based upon the facts or the law, I believe this shows the appearance of impropriety.
Judges shall respect and comply with the law
promote public confidence in the integrity of the judiciary
promote public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary.
Whenever a judge does not comply with the law, it is a violation of Canon 2A. From my experience, judges very often do not comply with the law.
- Judges Shall Perform the Duties of Their Office Impartially and Diligently
Canon 3 B.(2) -- Judges should be faithful to the law.
When a judge does not comply with the law, it is a violation of Canon 3 B. (2).
Canon 3 B.(5) -- Judges shall perform judicial duties without bias or prejudice.
When a judge demonstrates bias or perjudice, it is a violation of Canon 3 B. (5). Judges should recuse themselves when they have a bias or a prejudice, but they don't. This Canon is violated often. My experience is that most judges have a bias against pro se parties and a prejudice in favor of fellow members of the Bar.
Canon 3 B.(7)
Judges shall accord to every person the right to be heard according to law.
Judges shall not initiate or consider ex parte communications.
Judges violate this Canon when parties are denied the right to have hearings, testify under oath, examine witnesses, and cross-examine witnesses. My experience is that judges have routinely denied my most fundamental rights under the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Ex parte communications are when a party or an attorney communicate with a judge outside the presence of the opposing party or opposing counsel. You will not know when this happens in most cases. I discovered significant ex parte communication in my original case when the opposing counsel soght legal fees and had to produce their billing records. Those records showed conversations with the judge that neither I nor my attorney knew anything about.
Canon 3 B.(8) -- Judges shall dispose of all judicial matters fairly, promptly, and efficiently.
Judges often dispose of matters unfairly. They do so when they ignore the facts, ignore and violate the law, ignore and violate the rules, and commit criminal acts.
In my original case, the judge ignored everything in the case for 217 days. Many motions were filed by each side, and Judge Orinda D. Evans ignored them all. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals had the audacity to claim that 217 days was not a failure to dispose of matters promptly.
Canon 3 D. (1) -- Judges who receive information indicating a substantial likelihood that another judge has committed a violation of this Code should take appropriate action.
Judges ignore and violate this Canon. I have written to every federal appellate court judge in the country and each justice on the U.S. Supreme Court to inform them of violations oof the Code of Judicial Conduct and criminal violations by federal judges in Georgia, and not one of those judges did a thing. Judges routinely cover up the wrongful actions of their fellow judges, which is yet another violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct. I notified every judge in Fulton County Georgia of violations and criminal acts by several Fulton County Superior Court judges, and no one did a thing. In addition to being violations of the Code of judicial Conduct, the failure to report felonies to law enforcement is a criminal violation of 18 U.S.C. 4.
Canon 3 D. (2)
Judges who receive information indicating a substantial likelihood that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Standards of Conduct of the State Bar of Georgia should take appropriate action.
Judges having knowledge that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Standards of Conduct of the State Bar of Georgia that raises a substantial question as to the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects shall inform the appropriate authority.
Just as judges ignore the wrongdoing of fellow judges, they ignore the violations of attorneys. I have repeatedly filed motions for sanctions in regard to such violations by attorneys, and every single one of them has been ignored. This is a violation of this Canon.
Canon 3 E. (1) -- Judges shall disqualify themselves in any proceeding in which their impartiality might reasonably be questioned.
Judges refuse to recuse themselves when their impartiality would be questioned by reasonable people. Judges have made recusal a joke. While judges do not recuse (disqualify) themselves when it is appropriate, this refusal still constitutes a violation of Canon 3 E. (1) of the Code of Judicial Conduct.
Violation of the Law by Judges
Every federal judge who I have had the misfortune of dealing with has committed crimes. I have also been the victim of crimes by several judges in the Fulton County Superior Court.
Judges feel they can get away with anything because they are accountable to no one.
Subornation of Perjury â€“ O.C.G.A. 16-10-72, 18 U.S.C. Â§ 1622, O.C.G.A. 16-10-72, and O.C.G.A. 16-10-93
Obstruction of Justice â€“ O.C.G.A. 16-10-93, 18 U.S.C. 1503, and O.C.G.A. 16-10-93
Conspiracy To Defraud United States (Obstruct Justice) -- 18 U.S.C. Â§ 371
Making false statements -- 18 U.S.C. Â§ 1001
What You Can Do
There are a number of things that you can do. I do them all because I have no fear, and I am determined to expose these corrupt judges. But realize that if you take any of these actions, there will be repercussions. I have observed that judges indicate bias against a party who takes any of these actions. So, act only if you are not afraid of the consequences to you. You will find that your attorney will not want to do any of these as they will not risk their careers for any client.
Recusal -- I filed motions for recusal against every corrupt judge I encountered. I filed petitions for writ of mandamus to the court of appeals when the judges refused to recuse themselves. I even filed three petitions for writ of mandamus with the U.S. Supreme Court seeking to disqualify judges. I never won because the judges all cover up the wrongdoing of their fellow judges, but I did get more proof of violations of various types with each filing. My Motion for Recusal of Judge Jerry W. Baxter.
Judicial Complaints -- I file complaints with the appropriate entity. On every complaint, the response was that there was no evidence, but there was always massive evidence. I did get more proof of wrongdoing with each filing. Judicial Misconduct Complaint against Federal Judge Thomas W. Thrash -- Judicial Misconduct Complaint against Judge Orinda D. Evans -- Second Judicial Misconduct Complaint against Judge Orinda D. Evans.
Corruption Reports -- For example, I posted a Corruption Report of Judge Orinda D. Evans on www.LawlessAmerica.com. Our goal is to have this be the most comprehensive source or reports on bad judges and bad government officials of all types. This is a complete multimedia opportunity as you can post text, hyperlinkls, photos, documents of any type, and urls of websites with stories, etc.
Letters to Judges and Government Officials -- I write everyone, sending proof of wrongdoing and criminal acts. While no one does anything, it provides more proof of wrongdoing and violations of 18 U.S.C. 4. I have written to every member of the U.S. House and Senate, the President, the U.S. Attorney General, every federal appellate court judge, the U.S. Attorney, the FBI, every member of the Georgia House and senate, the Georgia Attorney General, the Fulton County Board of Commissioners, the Fulton County District Attorney, the Fulton County Sheriff, the Chief of the Atlanta Police department, and others.
Criminal Complaints -- I have filed criminal complaints with the Fulton County Sheriff's Department, the Atlanta Police Department, the Fulton County District Attorney, the U.S. Attorney, the FBI, the Attorney General, the Fulton County Grand jury, and the Federal Grand Jury in Atlanta. All of these complaints were ignored except by the Fulton County Grand Jury. I was invited to present my charges, which i did. I was instructed by the Grand Jury to return four days later with my evidence footnoted to a document listing the charges. When I returned to continue my testimony, I was intercepted in the public elevator lobby by the Cheif Investigator for the Fulkton County District Attorney, Cynthia Nwokocha, and three Fulton County Sheriff's Deputies. Criminal Complaint - Judge Orinda D. Evans -- Criminal Complaint -- Judge William S. Duffey -- Criminal Complaint -- Judge William S. Duffey (#2) -- Criminal Complaint -- Judge William S. Duffey (#3) -- Criminal Complaint -- Judge Joel F. Dubina and all judges of the Eleventh Circuit -- Criminal Complaint -- Judge Thomas W. Thrash (#1) -- Criminal Complaint -- Judge Thomas W. Thrash (#2) -- Criminal Complaint -- Bogus Action -- Criminal Complaint -- RICO.
Petition at the Courthouse -- I have positioned myself outside the courthouse with signs and petition forms. I educate people as to the corruption, and I meet many other victims. When I take a video camera on a tripod, I get far more people. If you can mobilize to do this at least one day a week (preferably Tuesdays), this will accomplish a lot. We can use such a platform to work to try to stop the re-election of the corrupt judges. Atlanta Petitioning. Crowd at Fulton County Courthouse in Atlanta Georgia during Petitioning to Stop Corrupt Courts
Movie -- You can testify before Congress and be in Lawless America...The Movie. This will send your message to the masses, including every member of Congress at the national and state level.
I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney. This website expresses my OPINIONS. The comments of visitors or guest authors to the website are their opinions and do not therefore reflect my opinions. Anyone mentioned by name in any article is welcome to file a response. This website does not provide legal advice. I do not give legal advice. I do not practice law. This website is to expose government corruption, law enforcement corruption, political corruption, and judicial corruption. Whatever this website says about the law is presented in the context of how I or others perceive the applicability of the law to a set of circumstances if I (or some other author) was in the circumstances under the conditions discussed. Despite my concerns about lawyers in general, I suggest that anyone with legal questions consult an attorney for an answer, particularly after reading anything on this website. The law is a gray area at best. Please read our Legal Notice and Terms.