When David took that package in to the U.S. Attorney's office with a cover letter addressed to Barbara McQuade, he made sure that she understood that he was relying upon 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3332 which specifically states that "if requested by a citizen" to have criminal information passed to the federal special grand jury, a federal prosecutor SHALL provide that information to the grand jury, which otherwise has the DUTY to inquire about crimes being reported within their district.
David spoke for about one hour with an assistant U.S. Attorney from the "criminal" division by the name of Regina McCullough. She observed the "form letter" of denial that David received in 2007, said she would have the "criminal civil rights division chief" review everything and get back with him within two weeks with a more detailed response. After 4 weeks had passed with no response, David made a phone call in follow up by leaving a message at the U.S. Attorney's office. On May 3, 2011, he got a call from a paralegal that was instrumentally involved in 2007 with the denial(s) that he received under U.S. Attorney Stephen Murphy's (2007) and U.S. Attorney Terrence Berg's (2008 through 2010) administrations. The paralegal stated that the civil rights "chief" called her at recognizing his name, had her check to see if he was the "same guy", had somehow determined by that information alone that his complaint was "the same" now as it was before, and had determined without further consideration that it did not qualify as a "civil rights" complaint.
When David reminded the paralegal that he was coming forward with a CRIMINAL complaint about government corruption, and in demand for a grand jury investigation, and that it was the U.S. Attorney's own "assistant" who had decided to take his complaint to the "civil rights" division rather than to the "public integrity" or "criminal" divisions of the U.S. Attorney's office, and that it would make more sense for that civil rights division "chief" to simply bring the complaint to the attention of the "right" division if the complaint did not fall into the right classification for "her" division, he was interrupted and simply told that his original documents would be sent back to him with a cover letter (assumed to be full of rhetoric and fraud).
This makes nearly 8 years now that David has been meticulously documenting this type of treasonous behavior coming from our State and Federal government officials. This is a violation of due process, a fraudulent sham, and violation of rights to "honest government services"