Judicial Corruption and Dishonesty

Hunter Tyler Schreck Federal Lawsuit - Chapter 1

Volleyball wide HTS loved but taken away cropped 200h

Hunter Tyler Schreck has filed a Mega-Million federal lawsuit in Amarillo, Texas for violation of his Constitutional rights. Hunter was almost murdered on June 24, 2020 by as many as 15 Amarillo, Texas Police officers and civilians. Hunter had done absolutely nothing. This is Chapter 1 of the story -- quotes directly from the verified complaint.

Hunter Schreck has filed his lawsuit pro se. He has named 58 Defendants and 100 John Doe Defendants (gangsters he will identify in discovery). If you want to read it all now, here is Civil Action No. 2-21CV-220-Z - Schreck v City of Amarillo, Et al. - Verified Complaint2-21CV-220-Z - Schreck v City of Amarillo, Et al. - Verified Complaint.

Volleyball wide HTS loved but taken away 640w


Civil Action No. 2-21-CV-220-Z

Hunter Tyler Schreck, Plaintiff,                                           


City of Amarillo, a Texas municipality; Randall County, a Texas municipality; Potter County, a Texas Municipality; Randall County District Attorney’s Office; Robert Love, Dave Blount; Randall County Clerk of Court’s Office; Joel Forbis; Randall County District Courts; Judge Dan L. Schaap; Judge Ana Estevez; Angela Johnson; Justice of the Peace; Randall County Jail; Amarillo Police Department; Chief Martin Birkenfeld; Officer Daniel Rivera; Officer Samantha Fontenot; Officer Allison Muncell; Officer Matthew Brush; Sergeant Anthony Merryman; Detective Shea Lichtie; Officer Daniel Smith; Officer Wiley D. Frazier; Sergeant Jason Bailey; Sergeant Jason Riddlespurger; Ryann Kass; W. Brooks Barfield; Samantha Wilson; Jubilee Apostolic Church; Nathan Carrington; Rolonda Carrington; Nataley Carrington; Aaron Gurule; Dana Gurule; Maria Veronica Canales; Victor Pimentel; George Hastings; Deborah Rauh; Dr. Ron Rankin; Leann Rhimes; Samona Pearson; Margaret Pearson; Timothy Bailey; Ileta Bailey; Adriana Cortez; Angelica Esparza; Brayan Zubiate; Chris Boroughs; Christian Morgan; Mariah Rose Murillo; Nyah Gonzalez; Andres Soria; Baptist St. Anthony Hospital; Dr. Thomas Martin; Dr. Thomas Mercado; Exceptional Emergency Center; Dr. Gina Matteson, and John Does 1-100, Defendants.


The Plaintiff, Hunter Tyler Schreck (“Hunter” or “Plaintiff”), by and through his mother Marcie Schreck by virtue of her Texas Statutory Durable Power of Attorney, respectfully alleges this Verified Complaint and Jury Demand (“COMPLAINT”) and avers as follows:


“A police man can not arrest a man who has not done no breaking of law.”

1.           “A police man can not arrest a man who has not done no breaking of law.”  Those were the words of Hunter Tyler Schreck in his Diary following his beating and arrest on June 24, 2020. [EXHIBIT 99.]

2.           First, this is a civil rights action to seek relief for the Defendants’ violations of rights secured by the Ku Klux Klan Act (Civil Rights Act of 1871) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the rights secured by the First, Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and rights secured under the Constitution and common law of the State of Texas.

3.           This is an action for declaratory relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 & § 2202; for injunctive relief, pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”); and for other relief.

4.           Defendants have conspired to perpetrate a fraud directed squarely at the integrity of the courts’ decision-making.  Intentional misstatements or omissions of material facts with knowledge of falsity or in reckless disregard for whether statements were true or false were made by some of the Defendants.

5.           The Plaintiff brings this action against Judge Dan L. Schaap, a judicial officer, pursuant in part to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, in claims arising from violations of federal Constitutional rights guaranteed in the First, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution and redressable pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Narcotics Agents.

6.           PLEASE NOTE:  The PLAINTIFF was charged with assault on a police officer when his face and body were hit by the fists, boots, and guns of Amarillo Police officers.  This is Randall County District Court Criminal Case Number 30487A.  The PLAINTIFF has been denied access to most of the discovery in that case and from Texas Public Information Act Requests.  As a result, significant detail and the identities of some of the perpetrators of the assault on the PLAINTIFF and the conspiracy are not yet available.  This COMPLAINT should be amended when that information is available.


1.                 This is a civil action for attempted murder.  Defendants committed Official Oppression pursuant to Texas Penal Code § 39.03, Official Misconduct, and many crimes.

2.                 This is a civil action under 42 U.S.C § 1983 seeking damages and injunctive relief against Defendants for committing acts, under color of law, with the intent and for the purpose of depriving Plaintiff of rights secured under the Constitution and laws of the United States; and for refusing or neglecting to prevent such deprivations and denials to Plaintiff.

3.                 This case arises under the United States Constitution and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and § 1988, as amended.  This Court has jurisdiction in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and § 1343.  The declaratory and injunctive relief sought is authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2201 and § 2202, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and Rule 57 of the FRCP.

4.                 There are other causes of action as well, including RICO, conspiracy, fraud, perjury, subornation of perjury, aggravated assault, intentional infliction of emotional distress, attempted murder, and more.

5.                 The Plaintiff brings this action resulting from damages incurred due to his beating and attempted murder on June 24, 2020 and the events since.

6.                 This Court is an appropriate venue for this cause of action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(1) and (b)(2).  The actions complained of took place in this judicial district.

7.   Actions were taken under color of Texas law and U.S. law, and the actions deprived the PLAINTIFF of Constitutional rights and statutory rights.  


1.           The Plaintiff alleges deprivation of rights secured by the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights as protected by Bivens, 42 U.S.C. § 1983; the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12131; and the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794.

2.           This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as Defendants were acting under color of state law; 28 U.S.C. § 1331 because acts complained of raise federal questions under the Constitution and laws of the United States; and 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a)(3)(4).

3.           The Plaintiff’s claims for declaratory and injunctive relief are authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2201 and § 2202 and Rule 57 of the FRCP.

4.           This Court has authority to award attorneys’ fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988.

5.           The Plaintiff further invokes this Court’s supplemental jurisdiction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a) over any and all state Constitutional and state law claims that are so related to the claims within the original jurisdiction of this Court that they form a part of the same case of controversy.

6.           Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. § 1391 (b) and (c) on the grounds that all of the events alleged herein occurred within the State of Texas or were directed at individuals within the State of Texas.


7.           Hunter Tyler Schreck (“Plaintiff” or “Hunter” or Hunter Tyler Schreck”) is a citizen of the United States and is a resident of Randall County Texas.  He has given his mother, Marcie Schreck, his Statutory Durable Power of Attorney, referenced and incorporated herein. [EXHIBIT 25.]  Hunter Tyler Schreck and Marcie Schreck live at 6302 Oakcrest Lane, Amarillo, Texas 79109, 254-651-7078, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..  Hunter Tyler Schreck has an Autism Spectrum Disorder.  It is a neurological condition with three association impairments: social communication, social interaction, and social imagination/play. “Autism is a lifelong developmental disability, sometimes referred to as Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD) or Autistic Spectrum Condition (ASC).  Its causes are not fully understood, although there is some evidence that genetic factors are involved.  The term ‘spectrum’ is used because, while all people with autism share three main areas of difficulty, their condition affects them in different ways.  Some can live relatively independently – in some cases without any additional support – while others require a lifetime of specialist care.” [EXHIBIT 101.]

8.           Defendant City of Amarillo Texas (“CITY OF AMARILLO”) is a political subdivision of the state of Texas and a “person” subject to suit within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 1983.  The CITY OF AMARILLO is legally responsible for virtually all of the wrongdoing and crimes committed against HUNTER TYLER SCHRECK.  City of Amarillo Texas, 601 S Buchanan, Amarillo, Texas 79101, 806-378-3000, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Other Articles about Hunter Tyler Schreck:

Hunter Tyler Schreck - a Disabled Young Man - has been Victimized by Police, District Attorney, and Pentecostal Church Members in Amarillo Texas

Just Like the Man who has Done Nothing Wrong by Hunter Tyler Schreck


Bill Windsor went to high school and college in Lubbock, Texas -- just a short drive from Amarillo, Texas.  This gives him a special interest in exposing the scum in the area of the country that he has loved so much. 

windsor bill 2014 10 28 mugshot ellis county jail 200w

Bill Windsor

I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney.  This website expresses my OPINIONS.   The comments of visitors or guest authors to the website are their opinions and do not therefore reflect my opinions.  Anyone mentioned by name in any article is welcome to file a response.   This website does not provide legal advice.  I do not give legal advice.  I do not practice law.   This website is to expose government corruption, law enforcement corruption, political corruption, and judicial corruption.   Whatever this website says about the law is presented in the context of how I or others perceive the applicability of the law to a set of circumstances if I (or some other author) was in the circumstances under the conditions discussed.  Despite my concerns about lawyers in general, I suggest that anyone with legal questions consult an attorney for an answer, particularly after reading anything on this website.  The law is a gray area at best.  Please read our  Legal Notice and Terms

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Copyright, 2021, Lawless America



Judicial Corruption is rampant.  Our rights to a fair trial are a myth.  Many judges are totally corrupt.


Our fundamental rights have been taken away by a government of wrongs. Stolen by corruption.


Misconduct is everywhere. Dishonesty abounds. Perjury, subornation of perjury, corruption!


Abuse, Dishonesty, Corruption.  It's all common with Police and Law Enforcement.


Government Dishonesty is Bad.
We must find honest people
and make them accountable
to We the People.

Joomla! Debug Console


Profile Information

Memory Usage

Database Queries