SCREEN

Profile

Menu Style

Cpanel
Headlines:

Judicial Corruption and Dishonesty

Texas Bar Grievance filed against The D.A. Robert Love in Canyon Texas - Hunter Tyler Schreck Case

Penis Nose cropped 200w

A State Bar of Texas Grievance has been filed against District Attorney Robert Love of Canyon, Texas. Robert Love should be disbarred and imprisoned. What he has done to Hunter Tyler Schreck and Marcie Schreck is unthinkable. Here's the Bar Grievance against Robert Love.

1. On June 24, 2020, approximately 15 Amarillo Police Officers and several civilians attempted to murder HUNTER TYLER SCHRECK (“HUNTER”) for the crime of Autism.  Judge Dan L. Schaap has ignored the facts in his apparent quest to inflict additional pain on HUNTER. The D.A. Robert Love has been the main henchman.

1.                  In January 2021, Judge Dan L. Schaap lied to HUNTER and his Mom, Marcie Schreck (“MARCIE”). [EXHIBIT 134.] He said HUNTER could represent himself and could terminate Brooks Barfield at any time.   “If you don’t want Mr. Barfield to represent Hunter, that is up to you.  Hunter can represent himself if that’s what he wants to do….”  “If you decide Hunter doesn’t need representation at all that’s a decision you get to make.”  EXHIBIT 297 is the audio recording of this ZOOM call; it can’t be filed electronically, and the Clerk of Court refuses to accept anything, so it will be mailed to Judge Kent Sims.

Penis Nose cropped
                                                                   This may be a photo of The D.A. Robert Love.  He looks like a Prick.
           If you see this man in Amarillo, grab your children, and go to a safe place.  This man is viewed as extremely dangerous, 
    especially to mothers and disabled children.  He is absolutely incompetent as an attorney, and he will screw you in a heartbeat.

1.                  On January 12, 2021, Judge Dan L. Schaap named Brooks Barfield to be a court-appointed attorney for HUNTER. [EXHIBIT 11.]  From January 12, 2021 to September 8, 2021, Brooks Barfield did absolutely nothing.  EXHIBIT 321 shows this. MARCIE made multiple calls attempting to speak to Brooks Barfield.  He never responded.

2.                  On July 26, 2021, Dr. Jay Gattis tested HUNTER and the Brain Scan revealed a Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. [EXHIBITS 237, 373, 374, 375.]

3.                  On August 21, 2021, Dr. Jay Faber, MD, of Amen Clinic issued a report on HUNTER that documented a brain injury, [EXHIBITS 399, 237, 373, 374, 375.] 

4.                  On September 17, 2021, Dr. Jay Faber, MD, of Amen Clinic signed a report on HUNTER that documented a brain injury, [EXHIBITS 399, 237, 373, 374, 375.] 

5.                  On October 16, 2021, a Statutory Durable Power of Attorney was executed by HUNTER. [EXHIBIT 25.]  It was filed by HUNTER. [EXHIBIT 26.]  It was received by the Clerk and then unlawfully omitted from the Docket. [EXHIBIT 376.]

6.                  On November 3, 2021, MARCIE spoke to Mashawn in The D.A. Robert Love’s Office.  The call was recorded, and EXHIBIT 200 is a transcription.  The Audio Recording is EXHIBIT 302.  Robert Love refused to meet with MARCIE to discuss resolution of the case.

7.                  On November 12, 2021, MARCIE sent a letter to The D.A. Robert Love, Certified Mail Return Receipt. [EXHIBIT 363.]

8.                  On November 18, 2021 in the courtroom of the 47th District Court, The D.A. Robert Love said HUNTER had to be there.  He said MARCIE was committing a crime by practicing law.  He said this should be stricken from the record.  The D.A. Robert Love said MARCIE could be charged criminally.  This was said many times.

9.                  On November 18, 2021, The D.A. Robert Love secretly prepared STATE’S OBJECTION TO VOID MOTION TO RECUSE AND HEARING. [EXHIBIT 331.]  It was never filed or served.  Judge Kent Sims was given a copy prior to the hearing in a secret meeting.  When MARCIE observed The D.A. Robert Love reading from something during the hearing, she asked Judge Kent Sims if she could see what he was reading from.  Judge Kent Sims nodded at The D.A. Robert Love, and he tossed a copy at MARCIE.  He did not present one to Judge Kent Sims during the hearing as Judge Kent Sims had obviously obtained a copy in advance at the secret meeting.  MARCIE checked the Docket, and EXHIBIT 331 was not docketed. [EXHIBIT 95.]  But Judge Kent Sims granted the VOID MOTION that was not filed, that he was never shown during the hearing.  Judge Kent Sims may not grant a motion that doesn’t exist.

10.              On November 18, 2021 in the courtroom of the 47th District Court, The D.A. Robert Love asked how soon the judge would be leaving.  Judge Kent Sims said “thirty minutes.”  The D.A. Robert Love said “I will get it to you before you leave.”  There had been no discussion about “it,” whatever “it” was.  But it was clear to MARCIE that “it” had to be something discussed in the illegal secret meeting.

11.              On November 18, 2021 at 1:24 p.m., MARCIE sent an email to The D.A. Robert Love. [EXHIBIT 325.]  She expressed outrage over his actions and requested proof of a crime and asked to be notified in advance of any Grand Jury proceeding charging her with a crime.  There was no response.

12.              On November 18, 2021 at 3:51 p.m., Amanda Weigle, Judicial Assistant to Judge Dan L. Schaap, filed an Order signed by Judge Kent Sims granting the non-existent STATE’S OBJECTION TO VOID MOTION TO RECUSE AND HEARING. [EXHIBIT 107.] 

13.              On November 18, 2021 at 3:51 p.m., Amanda Weigle, Judicial Assistant to Judge Dan L. Schaap, filed an Order signed by Judge Kent Sims denying the non-existent MOTION TO DISQUALIFY. [EXHIBIT 332.]

14.              On November 19, 2021 at 12:07 a.m., MARCIE sent an email making a FORMAL COMPLAINT against The D.A. Robert Love and Judge Kent Sims. [EXHIBIT 333.] 

Robert Love Penis Nose Flag Grievance 640w



15.              “The D.A. Robert Love needs to be disbarred.  He has committed significant wrongdoing in this case, and this likely indicates he has abused many others.

16.              On November 19, 2021 at 12:32 a.m., MARCIE sent an email to The D.A. Robert Love charging him and Judge Kent Sims with crimes. [EXHIBIT 96.]  She sent a Formal Complaint against The D.A. Robert Love for Criminal Acts. [EXHIBIT 344.]  She sent the Amarillo Police Department a Formal Complaint for Investigation against The D.A. Robert Love for Criminal Acts. [EXHIBIT 96.]

17.              On November 20, 2021 at 12:32 a.m., MARCIE Schreck emailed a Demand under 18 U.S.C. 4 for action to be taken on felonies committed by The D.A. Robert Love and Judge Kent Sims. 

18.              On November 18, 2021, the DEFENDANT was denied the effective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment and the Constitution of the United States.  The D.A. Robert Love allowed it to happen.

19.              The D.A. Robert Love presented alleged facts to the Court, but he was not under oath, and his objection presented alleged facts, but it was not verified, and there was no affidavit.

20.              Attorneys may not present facts unless under oath.  There was no testimony on 11/18/2021, and the Randall County District Attorney’s Office has never filed an affidavit in the case since the perjured Complaint.

21.              The Purported 11/18/2021 Hearing was not proper.

22.              Judge Kent Sims refused to swear in MARCIE or allow her to testify.  Her request for subpoenas was ignored.  This is a very serious matter, and evidence is vital.

23.              Case law makes it clear that an evidentiary hearing was required, but The D.A. Robert Love said nothing.

24.              The D.A. Robert Love repeatedly falsely and maliciously accused MARCIE of the crime of practicing law without a license.  This was a criminal act by The D.A. Robert Love.

25.              The D.A. Robert Love gave a motion to the judge without giving it to MARCIE.

26.              The D.A. Robert Love has threatened MARCIE and charged her in open court with commission of a felony.  The D.A. Robert Love should be disbarred and placed behind bars.  MARCIE sent him an email after the hearing. [EXHIBIT 325.]

27.              On Pages 1 and 2 of his VOID MOTION [EXHIBIT 368], The D.A. Robert Love falsely and maliciously claims MARCIE filed the MOTION TO RECUSE AND DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE DAN L. SCHAAP on 10/20/2021.  EXHIBIT 58 is the file-stamped motion.  The AFFIDAVIT was signed before a notary by HUNTER.  That sworn affidavit is the fundamental requirement of a motion to recuse or disqualify a judge.

28.              EXHIBIT 159 is a transcription of the audio recording of the filing.  It was filed by HUNTER who was accompanied by his mother. 

29.              Texas Statute Chapter 752 is not addressed in the VOID MOTION, but The D.A. Robert Love does note on Page 2, Line 9 that Marcie Schreck “identifies herself as an “attorney in fact, “authorized to act under a “Statutory Power of Attorney. “This is false. [EXHIBIT 331.]  Every document clearly shows Marcie Schreck identifies her authorization under a “Statutory Durable Power of Attorney.”

30.              The D.A. Robert Love claims everything is void because Ms. Schreck “identifies as an attorney.” This D.A. couldn’t tell the truth if his life depended on it.  MRS. Schreck has never identified herself as an attorney.  Never.  Nowhere.  Not at all.  The D.A. is a liar.

31.              The D.A. Robert Love NEVER addressed STATUTORY DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY.

32.              Research of every appellate decision in the history of the State of Texas using Fastcase did not identify any statute or case law to indicate that the Schreck’s Statutory Durable Power of Attorney is invalid. 

33.              The D.A. Robert Love falsely and maliciously claims on Page 3 of the VOID MOTION: “As can be easily determined from the face of the voluminous pleadings filed by Ms. Schreck, she identifies as an attorney.  It matters not that she claims to act as an ‘attorney in fact.’ She is not a member of the state bar or a licensed attorney. State law requires, with no exceptions, that any pleading filed on behalf of a criminal defendant in a district court must attest that they are a licensed attorney and this is done by providing the attorney’s State Bar of Texas identification number. TEX. R. CIV. P. 57.”

34.              He lied.  This may be a mental disorder.  Dyslexia is also possible.

35.              The D.A. Robert Love also lied in telling the Court: “State law requires, with no exceptions, that any pleading filed on behalf of a criminal defendant in a district court must attest that they are a licensed attorney and this is done by providing the attorney’s State Bar of Texas identification number….”  IT DOESN’T SAY THAT!

36.              On November 18, 2021, little The D.A. Robert Love accused MARCIE in open court of the crime of practicing law without a license.  Upon information and belief, this constitutes several criminal acts by The D.A. Robert Love.  The possibilities include: Aggravated Perjury - Texas Penal Code 37.03; Perjury - Texas Penal Code Section Art. 21.14; CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY - Texas Penal Code Sec. 15.02; Official Oppression - Texas Penal Code Sec. 39.03; OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT - Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 3.04; False Criminal Complaint; Abuse of official capacity.  There are also multiple civil causes of action, including Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress.

37.              In a document secretly given to Judge Kent Sims, The D.A. Robert Love cited Texas Penal Code 38.123 [See EXHIBIT 368, Page 4, Line 2.]  A fifth-grader would know this does not apply.

38.              The transcript of the hearing will show that threats of criminal prosecution were made again and again, even after the hearing ended.

39.              The D.A. Robert Love and Judge Kent Sims clearly had ex parte discussions before the hearing.  This violates Canon 3(B).  This was admitted in a subsequent filing. [EXHIBIT 390.]

40.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Preamble: A Lawyer’s Responsibilities 1.  The D.A. Robert Love has displayed no ethical standards whatsoever.  Only unethical.  Many of his violations are expressed herein.

41.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Preamble: A Lawyer’s Responsibilities 4.  The D.A. Robert Love’s conduct has not conformed to the requirements of the law.  He has used the law for ILlegitimate purposes.  He has used his position to harass and intimidate the DEFENDANT and Marcie Schreck.  He has violated legal process, and he has shown that justice and the legal process are terms that he chooses to ignore.

42.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Preamble: A Lawyer’s Responsibilities 8.  The D.A. Robert Love has only self-interest.

43.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.02 (c).  The D.A. Robert Love knows that 30487A is a fraudulent, criminal act.  He is obligated to know the law, and he has seen the evidence. 

44.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.02 Comments Scope of Representation (3).  The D.A. Robert Love has knowingly assisted the State in criminal or fraudulent conduct.  Details are provided in EXHIBITS 279, 160, 161, and herein.

45.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.02 Comments Scope of Representation (10).  The D.A. Robert Love has knowingly assisted the State in failing to provide the DEFENDANT with State information and evidence while the State has engaged in criminal and fraudulent conduct.  The D.A. Robert Love has refused to provide documents to the DEFENDANT ordered to be provided by the Texas Attorney General.

46.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.02 Comments Scope of Representation (11).  Robert Love is assisting the State in criminal or fraudulent conduct. 

47.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.02 Comments Scope of Representation (12).  Upon information and belief, The D.A. Robert Love has known all along that the actions of the City employees and the State were criminal and/or fraudulent.  He has failed to rectify this.

48.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.02 Comments Scope of Representation (13).  The D.A. Robert Love knows the State, City of Amarillo; Randall County; Potter County; Randall County District Attorney’s Office; Randall County Clerk of Court’s Office; Randall County District Courts; Randall County Jail; Amarillo Police Department; Jubilee Apostolic Church; and many individuals are involved in actions that are criminal or fraudulent.  But The D.A. Robert Love has done nothing to rectify the evildoing.

49.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.02 Comments Scope of Representation (18): Mandatory Disclosure Adverse to Client.  The D.A. Robert Love has failed to make the required disclosures.

50.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.02 Comments Scope of Representation 19.  The D.A. Robert Love has failed to make the required disclosures.

51.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.02 Comments Scope of Representation 21.  The D.A. Robert Love has failed to withdraw.  He has aided and abetted the criminal acts.

52.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.15. Declining or Terminating Representation - Mandatory Withdrawal 2.  The D.A. Robert Love has failed to withdraw.  He has committed violations of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct and has aided and abetted the criminal acts.

53.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.15. Declining or Terminating Representation - Mandatory Withdrawal – Discharge 4.  The D.A. Robert Love knows HUNTER could discharge Brooks Barfield at any time.  He had copies of the termination letters and filings.  Robert Love had a duty to inform the judges of this Rule.

54.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.15. Declining or Terminating Representation - Assisting the Client Upon Withdrawal (9).  The D.A. Robert Love knew HUNTER could discharge Brooks Barfield at any time.  He knew Brooks Barfield had a duty to turn over the file/evidence.  Robert Love refused to give the evidence to HUNTER.

55.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 3.01. Meritorious Claims and Contentions.  The D.A. Robert Love knows there is no basis for this action and that it is frivolous.  The D.A. Robert Love knows it is frivolous and contains knowingly false pleadings for a knowingly false claim.  This action was made primarily for the purpose of harassing or maliciously injuring a person and to wrongfully attempt to insulate the County, City, and others from a multi-million-dollar lawsuit.  EXHIBIT 279, EXHIBIT 160, and EXHIBIT 162 show that The D.A. Robert Love is unable make a good faith argument that the action taken is consistent with existing law or that it may be supported by a good faith argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law.

56.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 3.02. Minimizing the Burdens and Delays of Litigation.  The D.A. Robert Love has denied the DEFENDANT’s right to a speedy trial for over 500 days.

57.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 3.08. Lawyer as Witness.  The D.A. Robert Love will be an important witness in this case as will all of the employees of the District Attorney’s Office.

58.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 3.09. Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor.  The D.A. Robert Love has prosecuted and threatened to prosecute charges that the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable cause.  The D.A. Robert Love has threatened the DEFENDANT and his mother with or subjected to the rigors of a criminal prosecution without good cause.  The D.A. Robert Love has exploited the DEFENDANT’s right to counsel.  The D.A. Robert Love has failed to see that the DEFENDANT has been accorded procedural justice.  Knowing disregard of these obligations and a systematic abuse of prosecutorial discretion are violations of Rule 8.04.  The D.A. Robert Love has failed to make timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense, and, in connection with sentencing, disclose to the defense and to the tribunal all unprivileged mitigating information known to the prosecutor.  The D.A. Robert Love failed in his responsibility to see that justice is done, and not simply to be an advocate. This responsibility carries with it a number of specific obligations. Among these is to see that no person is threatened with or subjected to the rigors of a criminal prosecution without good cause.  In addition, a prosecutor should not initiate or exploit any violation of a suspect’s right to counsel.  The D.A. Robert Love has violated both of these responsibilities.

59.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 4.01. Truthfulness in Statements to Others.  The D.A. Robert Love has made false statements of material facts or laws.  The D.A. Robert Love has failed to disclose material facts to third persons when disclosure was necessary to avoid making the lawyer a party to a criminal act or knowingly assisting a fraudulent act.

60.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 4.01. Truthfulness in Statements to Others – Comment -- False Statements of Fact.  The D.A. Robert Love has committed all of these violations.

61.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 4.04. Respect for Rights of Third Persons.  The D.A. Robert Love has inflicted needless harm.

62.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 8.03. Reporting Professional Misconduct.  The D.A. Robert Love has knowledge that another lawyer has committed a violation of applicable rules of professional conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, but has failed to inform the appropriate disciplinary authority.

63.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 8.03. Reporting Professional Misconduct Comment.  The D.A. Robert Love has failed to initiate disciplinary investigations regarding attorneys and judges.

64.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 8.04. Misconduct.  The D.A. Robert Love has violated these rules; has engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation; has engaged in conduct constituting obstruction of justice; has knowingly assisted a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct or other law; and has violated other laws of this state relating to the professional conduct of lawyers and to the practice of law.

65.              Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 8.04. Misconduct Comment.  The D.A. Robert Love has committed criminal acts.  He is not fit for the practice of law.  He has abused his public office.

66.              The D.A. Robert Love presented one irrelevant case after another in his VOID MOTION claiming the Motion to Recuse was void.  MARCIE has done the analysis and has an explanation prepared or each erroneously cited case.

67.              The D.A. Robert Love should be examined by a psychiatrist to determine if he has mythomania and pseudologia fantastica, a mental disorder in which the person habitually or compulsively lies.

Copyright LawlessAmerica.com




Bill Windsor graduated from Monterey High School and Texas Tech University in Lubbock, Texas -- just a short drive from Amarillo, Texas.  This gives him a special interest in exposing the scum in the area of the country he has loved so much. 



windsor bill 1979 closeup of bill tan 1979 200w

Bill Windsor


I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney.  This website expresses my OPINIONS.   The comments of visitors or guest authors to the website are their opinions and do not therefore reflect my opinions.  Anyone mentioned by name in any article is welcome to file a response.   This website does not provide legal advice.  I do not give legal advice.  I do not practice law.   This website is to expose government corruption, law enforcement corruption, political corruption, and judicial corruption.   Whatever this website says about the law is presented in the context of how I or others perceive the applicability of the law to a set of circumstances if I (or some other author) was in the circumstances under the conditions discussed.  Despite my concerns about lawyers in general, I suggest that anyone with legal questions consult an attorney for an answer, particularly after reading anything on this website.  The law is a gray area at best.  Please read our Legal Notice and Terms

http://www.LawlessAmerica.com

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 

https://www.youtube.com/c/lawlessamericamovie

https://www.facebook.com/billwindsor1/

Copyright, 2021, Lawless America


#LawlessAmerica
#WilliamMWindsor
#BillWindsor
#scumbags
#HunterTylerSchreck
#HunterSchreck
#MarcieSchreck
#RandallCounty
#RandallCountyTexas
#Amarillo
#AmarilloTexas
#WBrooksBarfield
#brooksbarfield
#traumaticbraininjury
#amarillopolice
#amarillopolicedepartment
#DanielRivera
#AllisonMuncell
#matthewbrush
#SheaLitchie
#danielsmith
#JubileeChurch
#johnstiffmemorialpark
#davidblount
#daveblount
#nathancarrington
#rolondacarrington
#nataleycarrington
#jubileeapostolicchurch
#angelicaesparza
#brayanzubiate
#ChristianMorgan
#VictorPinentel
#AaronGurule
#DanaGurule
#georgehastings
#dennisgreen
#jbeghtel
#vpadilla
#jtinsley
#sgthaley
#samanthabowman
#samanthafontenot
#SamanthaBowmanFontenot
#bushland
#BushlandTexas





Judges

Judicial Corruption is rampant.  Our rights to a fair trial are a myth.  Many judges are totally corrupt.

Constitution

Our fundamental rights have been taken away by a government of wrongs. Stolen by corruption.

Attorneys

Misconduct is everywhere. Dishonesty abounds. Perjury, subornation of perjury, corruption!

Police

Abuse, Dishonesty, Corruption.  It's all common with Police and Law Enforcement.

Government

Government Dishonesty is Bad.
We must find honest people
and make them accountable
to We the People.